• COMP = complementizer, NMZ = nomInalizer, PRES = present, FUT - future, 3p = 3rd person plural marking, POSS = possessive marking 1. ha-ni-iena-s eniore wa-ni-rehas lah PRES-3PL-parent-NMIZ tomorrow FUT-3PL-visit COMP "My parents will visit tomorrow" 2. ha-ni-iena-s iak-nosa wa-ni-rehas lah PRES-3PL-parent-NMZ 15G.POSS-house FUT-3PL-visit COMP "My parents will visit my house" 3. ha-ni-iena-s wa-ni-rehas lah PRES-3PL-parent-NMZ FUT-3PL-visit COMP "My parents will visit." 4. *ha-ni-lena-s iak-nosa wa-ni-rehas PRES-3PL-parent-NMZ 1SG.POSS-house FUT-3PL-visit "My parents will visit my house 5. ha-Ø-ksa-s kowa oheron en-Ø-atakwe ken? PRES-35G-to.be.young-NMZ apple big PAST-3SG-eat COMP "Did the child eat the big apple?" 6. * Tsitso ha-Ø-ksa-s kowa en-Ø-atakwe ken en-Ø-raton iah Tsitso PRES-35G-to.be.young-NMZ apple PAST-3SG-eat COMP PAST-3SG-ask COMP Isitso asked whether the child ate the apple." Question: There is a crucial difference between sentence (1) and (2), select the most appropriate difference below: • The VP in sentence (1) contains one complement, while the VP in sentence (2) contains two complements. • The VP in sentence (1) contains one complement, while the VP in sentence (2) does not contain any complements • The VP in sentence (1) contains two complements, while the VP in (2) contains only one • The VP in sentence (1) does not contain a complement, while the VP in sentence (2) does

English

Question
• COMP = complementizer, NMZ = nomInalizer, PRES = present, FUT - future, 3p = 3rd person plural marking,
POSS = possessive marking
1. ha-ni-iena-s eniore wa-ni-rehas lah
PRES-3PL-parent-NMIZ tomorrow FUT-3PL-visit
COMP
"My parents will visit tomorrow"
2. ha-ni-iena-s
iak-nosa wa-ni-rehas lah
PRES-3PL-parent-NMZ 15G.POSS-house FUT-3PL-visit COMP
"My parents will visit my house"
3. ha-ni-iena-s
wa-ni-rehas lah
PRES-3PL-parent-NMZ FUT-3PL-visit COMP
"My parents will visit."
4. *ha-ni-lena-s
iak-nosa wa-ni-rehas
PRES-3PL-parent-NMZ 1SG.POSS-house FUT-3PL-visit
"My parents will visit my house
5. ha-Ø-ksa-s kowa oheron en-Ø-atakwe ken?
PRES-35G-to.be.young-NMZ apple big PAST-3SG-eat COMP
"Did the child eat the big apple?"
6. * Tsitso ha-Ø-ksa-s kowa en-Ø-atakwe ken en-Ø-raton iah
Tsitso PRES-35G-to.be.young-NMZ apple PAST-3SG-eat COMP PAST-3SG-ask COMP
Isitso asked whether the child ate the apple."
Question: There is a crucial difference between sentence (1) and (2), select the most appropriate difference below:
• The VP in sentence (1) contains one complement, while the VP in sentence (2)
contains two complements.
• The VP in sentence (1) contains one complement, while the VP in sentence (2)
does not contain any complements
• The VP in sentence (1) contains two complements, while the VP in (2) contains
only one
• The VP in sentence (1) does not contain a complement, while the VP in
sentence (2) does
Answer

The VP in sentence (1) contains one complement, while the VP in sentence (2) contains two complements.

Download to view full explanation
Sentence (1) contains the verb "visit" and the complement "tomorrow", while sentence (2) contains the verb "visit...
Solve any homework question FREE with our app, NO PAYMENT required!