Question
Refer back to "Bring on the Technology Bans!" and this text
to answer the question below.
How do the authors of each text develop their opposing
arguments? Which argument is more effective and why?
Cite evidence from both texts to support your answer.
EXTRA HELP
Ask yourself these questions to get started:
- what is the topic both texts share?
What is each text's opinion on this topic?
-What kind of evidence or elaboration do they each use to
prove their points?
-Which argument is stronger? Why do you think this?
Click to answer
SAVE DRAFT
Answer
The topic both texts share is the use of technology bans in schools. The authors of "Bring on the Technology Bans!" argue that technology bans are beneficial for students, citing evidence such as improved student engagement and increased focus on learning. The authors of the other text argue that technology bans are not beneficial, citing evidence such as the potential for increased stress and decreased access to educational resources. The argument in "Bring on the Technology Bans!" is more effective because it provides more evidence to support its claims and is more convincing overall.